[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130913171046.GA26207@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:10:46 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: dev->of_node overwrite can cause device loading with different
driver
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 05:53:31PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ran into a serious problem with overwriting device of_node property as
> it is done in many drivers for ARM. If probing fails in such a
> situation, the device could be loaded with a different driver.
>
> This is an example situation, based on balbi's tag usb-for-v3.12:
>
> ========================================================================
> File drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c:
>
> static int dsps_musb_init(struct musb *musb)
> {
> ...
> musb->xceiv = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(dev, "phys", 0);
> if (IS_ERR(musb->xceiv))
> return PTR_ERR(musb->xceiv); <-- This can return -EPROBE_DEFER
> ...
> }
> ...
> static int dsps_create_musb_pdev(struct dsps_glue *glue,
> struct platform_device *parent)
> {
> ...
> /* allocate the child platform device */
> musb = platform_device_alloc("musb-hdrc", PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO);
> if (!musb) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate musb device\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> musb->dev.parent = dev;
> musb->dev.dma_mask = &musb_dmamask;
> musb->dev.coherent_dma_mask = musb_dmamask;
> musb->dev.of_node = of_node_get(dn); <-- Overwrites the device of_node
> ...
> ret = platform_device_add(musb);
> ...
> }
> static int dsps_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> ...
> ret = dsps_create_musb_pdev(glue, pdev);
> ...
> }
>
> ========================================================================
> File drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c:
>
> static int
> musb_init_controller(struct device *dev, int nIrq, void __iomem *ctrl)
> {
> ...
> status = musb_platform_init(musb); <-- This calls dsps_musb_init
> if (status < 0)
> goto fail1;
> ...
> return status;
>
> }
> static int musb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> ...
> return musb_init_controller(dev, irq, base);
> }
>
> ========================================================================
>
> musb_dsps is a glue driver that creates a core device in the probe
> function and assigns it's own of_node to the new device.
> Starting at the platform_device_add call, this is the function call
> tree:
>
> platform_device_add()
>
> ...
>
> device_attach() in drivers/base/dd.c, which iterates through a list of
> drivers, calls __device_attach() on each of them. The list contains both
> drivers, musb_dsps and musb_core. This is where this example splits into
> two cases:
>
> 1. We find the first matching driver, musb_dsps:
>
> __device_attach()
> platform_match() /* for the musb_core, detecting a match. */
> driver_probe_device()
> really_probe()
> musb_probe() is called, which returns -EPROBE_DEFER
>
> /* really_probe drops the return value and makes some cleanups */
>
> 2. The error code does not reach the driver list iteration loop. It
> is not supposed to do so because the drivercore tries to find another
> matching driver. Now it tries the musb_dsps driver:
>
> __device_attach()
> platform_match()
> /* succeeds again, because the device has the
> of_node from its parent which claims that this
> is a musb_dsps device. */
> driver_probe_device()
> really_probe()
> dsps_probe() ... /* from here on it starts from the beginning. */
>
> This recursion continued until the kernel had no memory left. This is a
> special situation but there are many drivers that overwrite the of_node
> property in their probe function. So they can actually match with a
> different driver on the second or third probe attempt.
Ok, so what do you suggest we do for stuff like this? Fix up the musb
driver? Or something else?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists