[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130913174802.GU11427@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:48:02 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>, acme@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, trinity@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools, perf: Add a precise event qualifier v2
> Typically PMU drivers are per arch and all the format stuff is per pmu
> driver so I'd not worry about that just yet.
That's a good point. So hard coded numbers would be fine for now.
> Yes, that is an unfortunate situation. I (and either Acme or Jolsa)
> tried wrapping the bitfield in an anonymous union to create a named
> variable for the entire u64 but older GCC completely fails with that.
In theory it's possible by parsing readelf output.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists