linux-kernel - Re: Build failures due to commit 416161db (btrfs: offline dedupe)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:33:34 -0400
From:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>
To:	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.de>
CC:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	Zach Brown <zab@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Build failures due to commit 416161db (btrfs: offline dedupe)

Quoting Mark Fasheh (2013-09-13 13:58:01)
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 01:00:22PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > Quoting Guenter Roeck (2013-09-13 12:35:35)
> > I'm happy to fix this with a bigger put of the info struct, just
> > let me know the preferred arch-happy solution.
> 
> In fact old versions of the patch were putting the whole struct but during
> review I was asked to change it. This should be very straight forward to fix
> so long as we all stay calm ;)
>         --Mark

Mark, could you please send a patch for the whole-struct option until
the unaligned put is upstreamed?

-chris

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/