linux-kernel - Re: [tip:perf/core] perf: Update perf_event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:31:26 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>
To:	mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	peterz@...radead.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de
cc:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf: Update perf_event_type documentation

On Tue, 23 Jul 2013, tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Commit-ID:  a5cdd40c9877e9aba704c020fd65d26b5cfecf18
> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/a5cdd40c9877e9aba704c020fd65d26b5cfecf18
> Author:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> AuthorDate: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:09:07 +0200
> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> CommitDate: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:17:08 +0200
> 
> perf: Update perf_event_type documentation
> 
> Due to a discussion with Adrian I had a good look at the perf_event_type record
> layout and found the documentation to be somewhat unclear.
> 
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130716150907.GL23818@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>  kernel/events/core.c            | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> index 0b1df41..00d8274 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -478,6 +478,16 @@ enum perf_event_type {
>  	 * file will be supported by older perf tools, with these new optional
>  	 * fields being ignored.
>  	 *
> +	 * struct sample_id {
> +	 * 	{ u32			pid, tid; } && PERF_SAMPLE_TID
> +	 * 	{ u64			time;     } && PERF_SAMPLE_TIME
> +	 * 	{ u64			id;       } && PERF_SAMPLE_ID
> +	 * 	{ u64			stream_id;} && PERF_SAMPLE_STREAM_ID
> +	 * 	{ u32			cpu, res; } && PERF_SAMPLE_CPU
> +	 * } && perf_event_attr::sample_id_all
> +	 */
> +
> +	/*
>  	 * The MMAP events record the PROT_EXEC mappings so that we can
>  	 * correlate userspace IPs to code. They have the following structure:
>  	 *
> @@ -498,6 +508,7 @@ enum perf_event_type {
>  	 *	struct perf_event_header	header;
>  	 *	u64				id;
>  	 *	u64				lost;
> +	 * 	struct sample_id		sample_id;
>  	 * };
>  	 */
>  	PERF_RECORD_LOST			= 2,

So in Adrian Hunter's posted patches the PERF_RECORD_MMAP documentation
is also patched like all the others, with 

    struct sample_id                sample_id;

But in this tip message (and in the current linus-git kernel) somehow the
PERF_RECORD_MMAP line of the patch was dropped.

Was that intentional?

I'm trying to document this mess in the manpage, not fun.

Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/