linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/16] 3.11.1-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130913230347.GA5211@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:03:47 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ 00/16] 3.11.1-stable review

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 04:59:29PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 12:27 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:22:40AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:18:40AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Linus Torvalds
> >>><torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >>>>Your script may be a bit buggered...
> >>>
> >>>Or maybe I should take that as a sign that 3.11 is doing really well?
> >>>
> >>>I'll be optimistic.
> >>
> >>Hm, something went wrong here, let me track it down...
> >
> >Ok, that was my fault, was working off of a 'master' branch in a repo
> >that expected it to be on the linux-3.11.y branch.  Here's the real
> >pseudo-shortlog below.
> >
> >And it is short for now, as I've been holding off on applying patches
> >that are in your tree until 3.12-rc1 comes out.  The patches here are
> >ones that people have pointed out to me that should go in specifically
> >for various reasons.  So yes, I do think 3.11 is doing really well, I
> >have not heard of anything "major" being wrong with it yet.
> >
> >thanks,
> >
> >greg k-h
> >
> >
> 
> 3.11.1-rc1 applied cleanly to 3.11
> 
> Compiled and booted on the following systems:
> 
> Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5
> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
> 
> dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for
> this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No
> regressions in warn.

Great, thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/