[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10372288.T6XyLE5FeS@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 01:42:19 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: fix transition_ongoing count for powernow-k8
On Friday, September 13, 2013 06:29:37 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This has been running in my mind since few days... That we have fixed cpufreq
> core and all other drivers for transition serialization but what about
> powernow-k8? It is somewhat special (even more than exynos5440).. It queues a
> work from ->target() and may or maynot send notifications at all..
>
> Finally I have got a solution now (detailed logs in the patch)..
> These must go with following patchset:
The "must go" here is a totally wrong way of speaking about things, because I'm
not sure I'll take this patch series yet.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/12/173
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists