linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Input: gpio_keys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:56:00 -0700
From:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:	Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, david@...tonic.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: gpio_keys - wakeup_trigger

Benson,

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org> wrote:
> Allow wakeup_trigger to be defined per gpio button. Currently, all
> gpio buttons are set up as IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING.
> It may be more appropriate to only wake the system on one edge, for example
> if the gpio is for a Lid Switch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>

As discussed out of band, I'd tend to put the masking/error checking
in gpio_keys_get_devtree_pdata() then just rely on non-DT users not to
pass in nonsense, but I don't feel that strongly about it, so:

Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/