[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5234938E.7010809@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 09:49:18 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
CC: benh@...nel.crashing.org, rob@...dley.net, ananth@...ibm.com,
anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: fix some typos
On 09/13/13 20:49, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/kprobes.txt b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
> index 0cfb00f..ca278d5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kprobes.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ stack contents as the probed function. When it is done, the handler
> calls jprobe_return(), which traps again to restore the original stack
> contents and processor state and switch to the probed function.
>
> -By convention, the callee owns its arguments, so gcc may produce code
Are you sure about that?
It looks correct to me (before the patch).
> +By convention, the caller owns its arguments, so gcc may produce code
> that unexpectedly modifies that portion of the stack. This is why
> Kprobes saves a copy of the stack and restores it after the jprobe
> handler has run. Up to MAX_STACK_SIZE bytes are copied -- e.g.,
>
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists