[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130916102210.GA14102@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:22:11 +0200
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] PCI/MSI: Factor out pci_get_msi_cap() interface
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 05:20:44PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 05:32:05PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > I propose that you rework it that way, and at least find out what
> > (if anything) would break if we do that. Or maybe we just give up
> > some optimization; it would be nice to quantify that, too.
>
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> The series is what it seems a direction to take.
>
> Looks like we need PPC folks to agree on the quota check update
> for pSeries (yes, they do bail out with a positive return value
> from arch_msi_check_device()):
Hi Ben,
An initiative to simplify MSI/MSI-X allocation interface is brewing.
It seems pSeries quota thing is an obstacle. If it could be given up
(patch 2/9).
Thanks!
--
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists