[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130916160001.GC3909@katana>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:00:02 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v2] mfd: add STw481x driver
> So in the mean time are you happy with this "dummy" approach?
No. "dummy" is reserved for a dummy device in case an i2c slave needs
more than one address. The proper solution would be if
i2c_sysfs_new_device() could recognize the of_device_ids.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists