linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/11] 9p: fix dentry leak in v9fs_vfs_atomic_open

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130916232810.GG13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:28:10 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mszeredi@...e.cz" <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
	Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
	"M. Mohan Kumar" <mohan@...ibm.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] 9p: fix dentry leak in v9fs_vfs_atomic_open_dotl()

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:02:41PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:09:46PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> 
> > > I would definitely prefer EEXIST logics dealt with in fs/namei.c - if nothing
> > > else, it had been done wrong in too many instances...
> > 
> > Okay.
> 
> OK, so I'm taking 1, 5, 9, 10, 11, then add check to fs/namei.c:atomic_open(),
> leaving the rest of gfs2 ones for gfs2 tree...  Give me a few and I'll push
> that.

Pushed (head at d332c7).  That should cover 9p and fuse as well, AFAICS.
Do you have any problems with that variant?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/