[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130917080502.GH22421@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:05:02 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: ?????? <ZhangTianFei@...dcoretech.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ????: [PATCH 34/50] sched: numa: Do not trap hinting faults for
shared libraries
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:02:22AM +0800, ?????? wrote:
> index fd724bc..5d244d0 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1227,6 +1227,16 @@ void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work)
> if (!vma_migratable(vma))
> continue;
>
> + /*
> + * Shared library pages mapped by multiple processes are not
> + * migrated as it is expected they are cache replicated. Avoid
> + * hinting faults in read-only file-backed mappings or the vdso
> + * as migrating the pages will be of marginal benefit.
> + */
> + if (!vma->vm_mm ||
> + (vma->vm_file && (vma->vm_flags & (VM_READ|VM_WRITE)) == (VM_READ)))
> + continue;
> +
>
> =?? May I ask a question, we should consider some VMAs canot be scaned for BalanceNuma?
> (VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_RESERVED | VM_INSERTPAGE |
> VM_NONLINEAR | VM_MIXEDMAP | VM_SAO));
vma_migratable check covers most of the other VMAs we do not care
about. I do not see the point of checking for some of the VMA flags you
mention. Please state which of the additional flags that you think should
be checked and why.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists