[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130917103238.GM21013@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 11:32:39 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: fix fatal kernel-doc error
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 06:08:02PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>
> Fix fatal kernel-doc error in <linux/regulator/driver.h>:
>
> Error(include/linux/regulator/driver.h:52): cannot understand prototype: 'struct regulator_linear_range '
Applied with the first line redone, but this seems like really terrible
quality of implementation for the kernel-doc stuff - it shouldn't
explode over something readily copable with like this. Should we also
not pick this sort of thing up in -next?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists