[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130917024040.GH13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 03:40:40 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Aditya Kali <adityakali@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
anatol@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] vfs: avoid sb->s_umount lock while changing bind-mount
flags
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:42:30AM -0700, Aditya Kali wrote:
> During remount of a bind mount (mount -o remount,bind,ro,... /mnt/mntpt),
> we currently take down_write(&sb->s_umount). This causes the remount
> operation to get blocked behind writes occuring on device (possibly
> mounted somewhere else). We have observed that simply trying to change
> the bind-mount from read-write to read-only can take several seconds
> becuase writeback is in progress. Looking at the code it seems to me that
> we need s_umount lock only around the do_remount_sb() call.
> vfsmount_lock seems enough to protect the flag change on the mount.
> So this patch fixes the locking so that changing of flags can happen
> outside the down_write(&sb->s_umount).
What's to prevent mount -o remount,ro /mnt and mount -o remount,rw,nodev /mnt
racing and ending up with that sucker rw and without nodev? As for
lock_mount... nope - we carefully do *not* hold namespace_sem over any kind
of fs operations. Anything getting stuck while holding it will have
really nasty consequences.
So ->s_umount here is inelegant, but alternatives sucks worse...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists