linux-kernel - Re: "memory" binding issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <93B04AC6-6A94-476E-873B-D29208115875@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:53:49 -0500
From:	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	m.szyprowski@...sung.com, swarren@...dia.com,
	rob.herring@...xeda.com, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: "memory" binding issues


On Sep 16, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 10:22 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Where is Jermey's binding documented ?
> 
> It looks like I actually came up with this binding :-) Jeremy reminded
> me yesterday. It was posted to the DT list a while back, arguably we
> should have merged it.

:), can you either repost the binding for discussion or post a link to the old thread.

>> Is there concern of "breaking" whatever got merged in powerpc?
> 
> No. I'm happy to switch over to something else but if anybody uses the
> current one we have on powerpc, we can keep the code to support it as
> well, it's not a lot of it.

cool

- k

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/