[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130917155648.GN15645@radagast>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:56:49 -0500
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
CC: <balbi@...com>, Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v5] usb: phy-samsung-usb: Simplify PMU register
handling
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 05:53:31PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> On Tuesday 17 of September 2013 10:36:16 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 01:27:48PM -0700, Julius Werner wrote:
> > > *Ping!*
> > >
> > > Are there still unanswered concerns left with this patch? I hope my
> > > prior mails could clear up why I think that the PMU register
> > > description in the device tree for a specific PHY is represents the
> > > hardware more accurately after my patch, and my analysis of the
> > > Exynos4 situation currently not being implemented (and therefore not
> > > needing to be addressed by this patch) was correct. Please let me know
> > > if you have further objections... and if not, could we agree to have
> > > this picked up somewhere?
> >
> > I need acks for DTS part...
>
> This patch breaks Exynos 4, so it's a NAK from me.
>
> Anyway, a new, completely redesigned PHY driver supporting most of the PHY
> features (as opposed to only the basic subset currently) developed by Kamil
> Debski should show up soon, so I don't think there is any reason to apply
> any patches to this old driver.
awesome, then I espect to see a patch deleting the old driver shortly
:-)
cheers
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists