[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52379FEE.2080004@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:18:54 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
CC: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Terje Bergström <tbergstrom@...dia.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpu: host1x: use %pa to print dma_addr_t
On 09/16/13 17:06, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 08:46 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Thierry Reding
>>> <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:41:49PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>>>> This removes two warnings where dma_addr_t variables were printed using
>>>>> %x when built with CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y, thus having 64-bit dma_addr_t:
>>>>>
>>>>> drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/cdma_hw.c:57:3: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'dma_addr_t'
>>>>> drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/debug_hw.c:175:10: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'dma_addr_t'
>>>>
>>>> Hi Olof,
>>>>
>>>> I can't reproduce this. Does this perhaps depend on some other patch?
>>>> When I enable LPAE I do see similar warnings in drivers/iommu/tegra-*.c
>>>> and those can indeed be fixed using an equivalent patch.
>>>
>>> You need to enable LPAE on a platform that also selects
>>> ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT, I don't think tegra does. If you do it with
>>> multi_v7_defconfig you'll see them.
>>>
>>> However, see discussion on another of the emails in the series; I'll
>>> have to introduce a new format specifier instead.
>>
>> Or not.
>>
>> I don't know whether or not the dma_addr_t really needs a
>> fixed 18 byte output length for 64 bit uses.
>>
>> I think always using a cast for dma_addr_t addresses like:
>>
>> printk("dma_addr_t: %#llx\n", (u64)addr);
>>
>> would probably work just fine.
>
> Sigh. Any color would do. I just want to get rid of the mostly-bogus
> warnings that makes it harder to spot real problems, I really don't
> care how they're resolved.
>
> None of the affected platforms today use 64-bit DMA anyway, so casting
> down to u32 is equally acceptable. I'll repost with that instead.
Casting to u64 and using %llx is preferred for this throughout the kernel,
not u32.
That way you would never have to 'fix' those when those platforms use
64-bit DMA (this is where you say that they never will :).
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists