[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130918091104.e59e7f2e96b540bdc90f29fc@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:11:04 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: old trees
Hi Josh,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:53:16 -0400 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > 4xx 1 year, 4 months ago
>
> This is subarch is basically in maintenance mode. There have only
> been a handful of patches that have been submitted over the past year,
> and I've ACKed them for Ben to bring in via his tree. The arch isn't
> dead, but it's certainly not going to have much in the way of new
> changes. The overall powerpc tree is probably sufficient for
> linux-next.
Removed.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists