[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0BA3FCBA62E2DC44AF3030971E174FB301DB078F@HASMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 06:00:54 +0000
From: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>
To: Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ilw <ilw@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Ilw] 3.10.10-rt7: inconsistent lock state (iwlwifi)
>
> lockdep complains about this:
>
> [ 92.094870] CPU0
> [ 92.094871] ----
> [ 92.094872] lock(&trans_pcie->irq_lock);
> [ 92.094873] <Interrupt>
> [ 92.094875] lock(&trans_pcie->irq_lock);
> [ 92.094875]
> *** DEADLOCK ***
Sorry by I am not aware of all the details of RT kernels.
What I see here is that we always disable interrupts when we take trans_pcie->irq_lock so I don't see how this flow is possible - at least not in the world I know. Can you please elaborate on why this is possible in the RT world?
Thanks.
>
> [ 92.094877] 1 lock held by systemd-journal/1002:
> [ 92.094882] #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){+++++.}, at: [<ffffffff8152d04c>]
> __do_page_fault+0x1cc/0x5a0
> [ 92.094883]
> stack backtrace:
> [ 92.094885] CPU: 0 PID: 1002 Comm: systemd-journal Not tainted 3.10.10-
> rt7 #5
> [ 92.094887] Hardware name: Acer Aspire 1810T/JM11-MS, BIOS v1.3310
> 03/25/2010
> [ 92.094890] ffffffff81fd95f0 ffffffff81a21cf0 ffffffff81525783
> ffffffff81a21d40
> [ 92.094893] ffffffff81522347 0000000000000000 ffff880100000000
> ffffffff00000001
> [ 92.094895] 0000000000000002 ffff88013734d050 ffffffff8107d420
> 0000000000000000
> [ 92.094896] Call Trace:
> [ 92.094902] <IRQ> [<ffffffff81525783>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
> [ 92.094905] [<ffffffff81522347>] print_usage_bug+0x1fb/0x20c
> [ 92.094909] [<ffffffff8107d420>] ? check_usage_backwards+0x140/0x140
> [ 92.094912] [<ffffffff8107de3a>] mark_lock+0x23a/0x2c0
> [ 92.094914] [<ffffffff8107ec4f>] __lock_acquire+0x7ff/0x1a60
> [ 92.094918] [<ffffffff8152d04c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x1cc/0x5a0
> [ 92.094920] [<ffffffff81080622>] lock_acquire+0x62/0x80
> [ 92.094927] [<ffffffffa015587c>] ? iwl_pcie_isr_ict+0x2c/0x2d0 [iwlwifi]
> [ 92.094930] [<ffffffff81529360>] rt_spin_lock+0x40/0x50
> [ 92.094936] [<ffffffffa015587c>] ? iwl_pcie_isr_ict+0x2c/0x2d0 [iwlwifi]
> [ 92.094943] [<ffffffffa015587c>] iwl_pcie_isr_ict+0x2c/0x2d0 [iwlwifi]
> [ 92.094948] [<ffffffff810a88d5>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x55/0x180
> [ 92.094951] [<ffffffff810a8a38>] handle_irq_event+0x38/0x60
> [ 92.094954] [<ffffffff810aab7f>] handle_edge_irq+0x6f/0x140
> [ 92.094956] [<ffffffff81003ae9>] handle_irq+0x19/0x30
> [ 92.094959] [<ffffffff810039b5>] do_IRQ+0x45/0xb0
> [ 92.094962] [<ffffffff8152a22d>] common_interrupt+0x6d/0x6d
> [ 92.094966] <EOI> [<ffffffff8152d04c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x1cc/0x5a0
> [ 92.094969] [<ffffffff810806e0>] ? lock_release_non_nested+0xa0/0x300
> [ 92.094973] [<ffffffff8106196d>] ? get_parent_ip+0xd/0x50
> [ 92.094976] [<ffffffff8152a2c9>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13
> [ 92.094980] [<ffffffff8123ed3d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x3a/0x3c
> [ 92.094983] [<ffffffff8152d429>] do_page_fault+0x9/0x10
> [ 92.094985] [<ffffffff8152a502>] page_fault+0x22/0x30
> [ 92.288725] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: L1 Enabled; Disabling L0S
> [ 92.291849] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: Radio type=0x1-0x2-0x0
> [ 92.422236] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ilw mailing list
> ilw@...ux.intel.com
> http://linux.intel.com/mailman/listinfo/ilw
Powered by blists - more mailing lists