| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:38:21 +0200
From: Maxime COQUELIN <maxime.coquelin@...com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Srinivas KANDAGATLA <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen GALLIMORE <stephen.gallimore@...com>,
Stuart MENEFY <stuart.menefy@...com>,
Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...com>,
Olivier CLERGEAUD <olivier.clergeaud@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: STi: Supply I2C configuration to STiH415 SoC
On 09/18/2013 02:00 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013, Maxime COQUELIN wrote:
>
>> This patch supplies I2C configuration to STiH415 SoC.
>>
>> Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415-pinctrl.dtsi | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415.dtsi | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415-pinctrl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415-pinctrl.dtsi
>> index 1d322b2..e56449d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415-pinctrl.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415-pinctrl.dtsi
>> @@ -86,6 +86,24 @@
>> };
>> };
>> };
>> +
>> + sbc_i2c0 {
>> + pinctrl_sbc_i2c0_default: sbc_i2c0-default {
>> + st,pins {
>> + sda = <&PIO4 6 ALT1 BIDIR>;
>> + scl = <&PIO4 5 ALT1 BIDIR>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + sbc_i2c1 {
>> + pinctrl_sbc_i2c1_default: sbc_i2c1-default {
>> + st,pins {
>> + sda = <&PIO3 2 ALT2 BIDIR>;
>> + scl = <&PIO3 1 ALT2 BIDIR>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> };
>>
>> pin-controller-front {
>> @@ -143,6 +161,24 @@
>> reg = <0x7000 0x100>;
>> st,bank-name = "PIO12";
>> };
>> +
>> + i2c0 {
>> + pinctrl_i2c0_default: i2c0-default {
>> + st,pins {
>> + sda = <&PIO9 3 ALT1 BIDIR>;
>> + scl = <&PIO9 2 ALT1 BIDIR>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + i2c1 {
>> + pinctrl_i2c1_default: i2c1-default {
>> + st,pins {
>> + sda = <&PIO12 1 ALT1 BIDIR>;
>> + scl = <&PIO12 0 ALT1 BIDIR>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> };
>>
>> pin-controller-rear {
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415.dtsi
>> index 74ab8de..643ae1c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415.dtsi
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>> #include "stih41x.dtsi"
>> #include "stih415-clock.dtsi"
>> #include "stih415-pinctrl.dtsi"
>> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> / {
>>
>> L2: cache-controller {
>> @@ -83,5 +84,61 @@
>> pinctrl-names = "default";
>> pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_sbc_serial1>;
>> };
>> +
>> + i2c0: i2c@...40000{
> Space before the '{'.
It will be fixed in next series
>
>> + compatible = "st,comms-i2c";
>> + status = "disabled";
> Consider putting the node status at the bottom.
Ok.
>
>> + reg = <0xfed40000 0x110>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 187 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> + clocks = <&CLKS_ICN_REG_0>;
>> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_i2c0_default>;
>> + st,glitches;
>> + st,glitch-clk = <500>;
>> + st,glitch-dat = <500>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + i2c1: i2c@...41000{
> Same here and throughout.
Ok.
>
>> + compatible = "st,comms-i2c";
>> + status = "disabled";
> Same here and throughout.
Ok.
>
>> + reg = <0xfed41000 0x110>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 188 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> + clocks = <&CLKS_ICN_REG_0>;
>> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_i2c1_default>;
>> + st,glitches;
>> + st,glitch-clk = <500>;
>> + st,glitch-dat = <500>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sbc_i2c0: i2c@...40000{
>> + compatible = "st,comms-i2c";
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + reg = <0xfe540000 0x110>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 206 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> + clocks = <&CLK_SYSIN>;
>> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_sbc_i2c0_default>;
>> + st,glitches;
>> + st,glitch-clk = <500>;
>> + st,glitch-dat = <500>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sbc_i2c1: i2c@...41000{
>> + compatible = "st,comms-i2c";
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + reg = <0xfe541000 0x110>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 207 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> + clocks = <&CLK_SYSIN>;
>> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_sbc_i2c1_default>;
>> + st,glitches;
>> + st,glitch-clk = <500>;
>> + st,glitch-dat = <500>;
>> + };
>> };
>> };
> Is this odd tabbing just the result of the patch format?
This is just the result of the patch format.
Regards,
Maxime
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists