[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5239A0BE.7050203@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 06:46:54 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Full syscall argument decode in "perf trace"
On 9/18/13 5:35 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Therefore my question should be restated as:
>
> Would perf developers accept the "syscall pausing" feature,
> or it won't be accepted?
I have been using perf-trace a lot lately specifically because it is
effectively a 'passive' observer of the task (e.g., time-sensitive tasks
can be traced with perf but not with strace).
Also, your solution would not work if the raw_syscall events are written
to a file for later analysis where as using tracepoints to collect this
information would.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists