[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130918140844.GA17742@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:08:44 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Support for Openembedded/Yocto -dbg packages
Em Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 03:29:03PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net> wrote:
> > Em Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:18:01PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> > > len += snprintf(str + len, size - len, ...);
> > > len += snprintf(str + len, size - len, ...);
> > And avoid snprintf like the plague, use scnprintf instead... See
> > e7f01d1e3d8d501deb8abeaa269d5d48a703b8b0 for details :-)
> Hm, could we do:
> #define snprintf scnprintf
> or:
> #define snprintf(x...) BUILD_BUG()
> ?
Yes, I prefer the later, with a short explanation, will do.
- Arnaldo
> I don't think there's any valid code, except printf wrappers (which we
> don't have in perf), where the semantics of snprintf() would be needed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists