[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201309181843.49850@pali>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 18:43:49 +0200
From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To: balbi@...com
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <martinez.javier@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
freemangordon@....bg, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] usb: musb: Call atomic_notifier_call_chain when status is changed
On Wednesday 18 September 2013 18:36:49 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 05:56:12PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 September 2013 15:57:13 Javier Martinez
> > Canillas
> >
> > wrote:
> > > to split the patch in two since the patch was solving
> > > two separate issues
> >
> > My patch does not solving *two* issues. It is *one*
> > regression and both parts of patch are needed for fixing
> > it. Read commit message again. It does not make sense to
> > split patch fixing kernel regression into more one line
> > patches - or please clarify why.
>
> issue 1) twl4030-usb.c doesn't initialize atomic notifier head
> issue 2) musb doesn't call notifier chain
>
> do you need a drawing ?
Regression 1) power supply drivers not working since v3.5
Look at firsts emails.
Do you really have problem to do what *you* need with 1 line
patch which I sent? Or what what you want?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists