linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] perf lock: do not cut lock name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8738p2hvye.wl%mitake.hitoshi@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Sep 2013 02:38:01 +0900
From:	Hitoshi Mitake <mitake.hitoshi@...il.com>
To:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>,
	Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] perf lock: do not cut lock name


Hi Davidlohr, thanks for your enhancements and cleanings!

At Sun,  8 Sep 2013 19:19:17 -0700,
 Bueso wrote:
> 
> While this could be seen as personal taste, there really isn't any
> reason for being so stingy printing the lock name. Furthermore, some
> symbol names are really just too long, and cutting them at 16 characters
> doesn't help at all.

I agree with your opinion that 16 chars are too short for lock names,
but I think if we should print "..." for indicating the abbreviation.

Thanks,
Hitoshi

> 
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-lock.c | 18 ++----------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
> index 780484f..2674a42 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
> @@ -696,10 +696,9 @@ static void print_bad_events(int bad, int total)
>  static void print_result(void)
>  {
>  	struct lock_stat *st;
> -	char cut_name[20];
>  	int bad, total;
>  
> -	pr_info("%20s ", "Name");
> +	pr_info("%40s ", "Name");
>  	pr_info("%10s ", "acquired");
>  	pr_info("%10s ", "contended");
>  
> @@ -716,21 +715,8 @@ static void print_result(void)
>  			bad++;
>  			continue;
>  		}
> -		bzero(cut_name, 20);
> -
> -		if (strlen(st->name) < 16) {
> -			/* output raw name */
> -			pr_info("%20s ", st->name);
> -		} else {
> -			strncpy(cut_name, st->name, 16);
> -			cut_name[16] = '.';
> -			cut_name[17] = '.';
> -			cut_name[18] = '.';
> -			cut_name[19] = '\0';
> -			/* cut off name for saving output style */
> -			pr_info("%20s ", cut_name);
> -		}
>  
> +		pr_info("%40s ", st->name);
>  		pr_info("%10u ", st->nr_acquired);
>  		pr_info("%10u ", st->nr_contended);
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.11.7
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/