[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130918224032.84e09e0c1372dbc51c86ab1e@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:40:32 +0400
From: Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
suspend-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [BUG] 3.7-rc regression bisected: s2disk fails to resume image:
Processes could not be frozen, cannot continue resuming
Hello,
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:52:39 +0100 Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:48:43AM +0400, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > > Additional (but probably useless) information on this bug may be found
> > > here: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7371120.html
>
> Something's very fishy there:
>
> [quote]
> Digging into suspend-utils code shows that the following ioctl fails on
> "/dev/snapshot":
>
> Code:
> ioctl(dev, _IO(3, 1), 0);
> [end quote]
>
> but that's _not_ anything freeze-related - that's HDIO_GETGEO, and with zero
> as last argument it will fail, no matter what. With EFAULT, if nothing
> else...
>
> Which ioctl() it really is? A bit further down you write "I modified suspend
> code to see errno, so freeze on /dev/snapshot fails [with EAGAIN]", so you
> have isolated the call in question. Could you quote the actual code?
Actual code is from suspend-utils tree, swsusp.h:
static inline int freeze(int dev)
{
return ioctl(dev, SNAPSHOT_FREEZE, 0);
}
And from suspend_ioctls.h:
#define SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC '3'
#define SNAPSHOT_FREEZE _IO(SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC, 1)
My mistake, should be '3' instead of 3.
Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists