linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/26] ARM: provide common arch init for DT clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <523A10F5.7090009@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:45:41 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
CC:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...inux.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	STEricsson <STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com>,
	linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/26] ARM: provide common arch init for DT clocks

On 09/18/2013 01:52 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 09/18/2013 09:47 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 07:53:33PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>> ...
>>> Sebastian Hesselbarth (26):
>>>    ARM: nomadik: move mtu setup to clocksource init
...
>>
>> How would you like to handle this series?
> 
> Jason,
> 
> honestly I don't really know, yet. I was hoping for Arnd and Olof
> decide on that. Maybe they also create a topic branch up to where
> arch-wide of_clk_init is introduced. Then each removal patch can
> go through the independent sub-trees. There may be more machs
> introduced before, that can then also depend on the common branch.

Oh, I was assuming you'd just take the whole thing through one tree,
likely in arm-soc. That's why I created the topic branch for the Tegra
PMIC patch that's a dependency of this... However, I guess if you just
merge the core into a topic branch in arm-soc and everyone merges it
back, that's fine. I assume the Tegra topic branch I created won't be
necessary in that case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/