[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6153c724-9322-4198-8f15-49a30fe734f5@email.android.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:15:00 -0500
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>
CC: rydberg@...omail.se, carl@...labs.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] uinput: Support injecting multiple events in one write() call
Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com> wrote:
>On 19/09/13 05:48, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
>> Hi Ryan,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 08:55:44AM +1000, Ryan Mallon wrote:
>>> Rework the code in uinput_inject_event so that it matches the code
>in
>>> evdev_write and allows injecting more than one event, or zero
>events.
>>
>> After some thinking I went back to the original version of your
>patch.
>> For justification see 46f49b7a223ac7493e7cf619fb583d11edefc2c2:
>>
>> "When copy_to/from_user fails in the middle of transfer we should not
>> report to the user that read/write partially succeeded but rather
>> report -EFAULT right away, so that application will know that it got
>> its buffers all wrong.
>>
>> If application messed up its buffers we can't trust the data fetched
>> from userspace and successfully written to the device or if data read
>> from the device and transferred to userspace ended up where
>application
>> expected it to end."
>
>
>Okay, so patch 1 is obviously dropped. Do you want me to resend a fixed
>
>version of this one, or have you already modified it?
I took your original version - is does the right thing.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists