[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1379482610.1787.7.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 22:36:50 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@...ox.com>
Cc: linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] lib: Add error string support to printks
On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 18:08 -0500, danielfsantos@....net wrote:
> This adds an extension for the integral format specifier suffix of 'e',
> so that the format %[duxXo]e will result in printing an number (as
> before) in addition to a name and descrption for an error code, if such
> support is enabled and a name and descrption is found.
>
> My initial thought was to use the glibc extension of '%m', but this
> format specifier uses the value of libc's errno and adding a value
> breaks gcc's printf parsing. I'm not convinced that the 'e' extension
> is optimal, although there are only four instances of this pattern in
> the kernel that would need to be changed.
>
> git grep -E '".*%[#0\ +\-]*[0-9]*[hljzt]*[idoxXu]e'
>
> Alternatively, 'E' was another thought for a suffix as well.
I'd much rather see another %p extension used instead
of generating odd output given normal printf formats.
%pE might work
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists