[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130918065406.GA13451@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:54:07 +0500
From: "Zubair Lutfullah :" <zubair.lutfullah@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Zubair Lutfullah <zubair.lutfullah@...il.com>, jic23@....ac.uk,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: ti_am335x_adc: Add continuous sampling support
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 09:27:27PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Zubair,
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 09:44:07AM +0500, Zubair Lutfullah wrote:
> > +
> > + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(indio_dev->dev.parent,
> > + irq,
> > + pollfunc_th, pollfunc_bh,
> > + flags, indio_dev->name,
> > + indio_dev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto error_kfifo_free;
> > +
> > + indio_dev->setup_ops = setup_ops;
> > + indio_dev->modes |= INDIO_BUFFER_HARDWARE;
> > +
> > + ret = iio_buffer_register(indio_dev,
> > + indio_dev->channels,
> > + indio_dev->num_channels);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto error_free_irq;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +error_free_irq:
> > + devm_free_irq(indio_dev->dev.parent, irq, indio_dev);
>
> What is the point of using devm_* here if you are doing explicit
> management of the resource anyway (you explicitly release it in all code
> paths)?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Dmitry
I admit I am unaware at the moment about how it works.
I use devm and simply ignore the error path?
The devm function header description said something about using
devm_free when freeing. And this is the way I am used to seeing
error handling.
Zubair
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists