lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:56:30 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:	Milo Kim <milo.kim@...com>, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] Documentation: add LP3943 DT bindings and document

On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Thierry Reding wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 08:30:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Sep 2013, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:24:55PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Milo Kim wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/lp3943.txt b/Documentation/lp3943.txt
> > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > index 0000000..576ebd0
> > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/lp3943.txt
> > > [...]
> > > > If this stuff is really important (and most of it really isn't), then
> > > > put it either in the commit log or in the driver.
> > > 
> > > I can only speak for myself, but the initial driver commit message is
> > > about the last place I look for this kind of information. I'd expect it
> > > to be either somewhere in Documentation/ or in one of the source files.
> > > In this case I'd probably look at the MFD core driver source file. More
> > > likely, even, I'd just go google "LP3943" and grab a public datasheet
> > > from TI where all of this can hopefully be found.
> > 
> > The latter option is the most common. If the datasheet is publicly
> > available, then there is no rhyme nor reason to put it in the kernel
> > source too. /Documentation is already overloaded, it would be even
> > more so if each and every driver residing in the kernel decided to
> > bulk it up further.
> 
> Okay. So in this case perhaps Milo should simply drop the documentation
> file. Perhaps link to the public datasheet from on of the source files,
> although that could be problematic if the URL isn't permanent.

I'm not sure even that's required.

I just Googled it and found the datasheet on the first hit.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ