linux-kernel - [RFC] Patches: Already submitted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGG-pUSVgW22Bs5Ui=qtgNEy2SyR-p0pnRxsQaNNTonyYnM6EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:07:41 -0300
From:	Geyslan Gregório Bem <geyslan@...il.com>
To:	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] Patches: Already submitted

Hello maintainers,

I submitted two patches:

[PATCH 01/02] x86: Useless inode var, printks and coding style fixes
[PATCH 02/02] x86_64: Add safe check in a.out loaders and some coding style

I know that I did a mess with the submissions, because I didn't put
the versions between the brackets, and sent some e-mail directly to
maintainers. I know now that they will not be answered.

My question are:
- Do I need to resend them putting the version tag, or this time I'll
be forgived?
- The main tags (x86 and x86_64) are correct? I'm patching the a.out
loader files.

Sorry about that mess one more time.

Regards,

Geyslan Gregório Bem
hackingbits.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/