[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <523B05FD.7020200@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 18:11:09 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
CC: balbi@...com, bcousson@...libre.com, tony@...mide.com,
balajitk@...com, kishon@...com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 15/15] arm: dts: dra7: add sata node
Hello.
On 09/19/2013 05:24 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> From: Balaji T K <balajitk@...com>
> Add support for sata controller.
> [Roger Q] Clean up.
> CC: Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Balaji T K <balajitk@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
> index ce9a0f0..545545d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
> @@ -426,6 +426,55 @@
> dma-names = "tx", "rx";
> };
>
> + omap_control_sata: control-phy@...02374 {
> + compatible = "ti,control-phy-pipe3";
> + reg = <0x4a002374 0x4>;
> + reg-names = "power";
> + clocks = <&sys_clkin1>;
> + clock-names = "sysclk";
> + };
> +
> + ocp2scp3: ocp2scp3@...90000 {
> + compatible = "ti,omap-ocp2scp";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges;
> + ti,hwmods = "ocp2scp3";
> + reg = <0x4a090000 0x1f>; /* ocp2scp3 */
> + reg-names = "ocp2scp3";
> + sata_phy: sataphy@...96000 {
It's better to name the PHY nodes uniformly after already standard
"ethernet-phy" and your "control-phy".
> + compatible = "ti,phy-pipe3-sata";
> + reg = <0x4A096000 0x80>, /* phy_rx */
> + <0x4A096400 0x64>, /* phy_tx */
> + <0x4A096800 0x40>; /* pll_ctrl */
> + reg-names = "phy_rx", "phy_tx", "pll_ctrl";
> + ctrl-module = <&omap_control_sata>;
> + clocks = <&sata_ref_clk>,
> + <&sys_clkin1>;
> + clock-names = "optclk", "sysclk";
> + #phy-cells = <0>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + sata: sata@...41100 {
> + compatible = "ti,sata";
> + ti,hwmods = "sata";
> + reg = <0x4a141100 0x7>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges;
> + dwc-ahci@...40000 {
Hm, ePAPR spec. [1] says that "the name of a node should be somewhat
generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise programming
model", so it looks like the name should be "sata" as well. I'm a bit at a
loss here, not sure why you had to use the nested device nodes.
> + compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci";
> + reg = <0x4a140000 0x1100>;
> + interrupts = <0 54 0x4>;
> + phys = <&sata_phy>;
Hm, it's the third PHY related generic property I'm encountering. First,
there was "phy-handle", then "phy", now "phys"... Seems like a bit too much. :-)
> + phy-names = "sata-phy";
> + clocks = <&sata_ref_clk>;
> + clock-names = "optclk";
> + };
> + };
[1] http://www.power.org/resources/downloads/Power_ePAPR_APPROVED_v1.0.pdf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists