linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: fix fatal kernel-doc error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130919152626.GB7925@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 19 Sep 2013 23:26:26 +0800
From:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: fix fatal kernel-doc error

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 03:01:31PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 07:33:28AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 08:23:55PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > Could these checks be added to Fengguang's tester?  If nobody's looking
> > > at the output (I've never found the processed output useful myself) or
> > > running the tool then it's a bit worrying...
> 
> > Yes, I'm running "make htmldocs" checks and send out all new warnings:
> 
> > Does that sound enough?
> 
> I'd expect it to be but then it seems like the issue that Randy found
> wasn't picked up...  not sure if there's some other build that would
> cover it or something.

Yes.. it was missed because the script used to only grep for
"Warning(.*)" patterns and ignored the "Error(.*)" ones. Fixed
since last email.

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/