[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000001413796641f-017482d3-1194-499b-8f2a-d7686c1ae61f-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 18:58:25 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: RFC vmstat: On demand vmstat threads
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The vmstat accounting is not the only thing which we want to delegate
> to dedicated core(s) for the full NOHZ mode.
>
> So instead of playing broken games with explicitly not exposed core
> code variables, we should implement a core code facility which is
> aware of the NOHZ details and provides a sane way to delegate stuff to
> a certain subset of CPUs.
I would be happy to use such a facility. Otherwise I would just be adding
yet another kernel option or boot parameter I guess.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists