linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: fix the build warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1379670782.5938.14.camel@x220.thuisdomein>
Date:	Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:53:02 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc:	James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Zhi Yong Wu <zwu.kernel@...il.com>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel mlist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
	Antonio Alecrim Jr <antonio.alecrim@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: fix the build warning

On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 23:49 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2013/8/22 James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>:
> > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 21:42 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> >> Unfortunately, this warning isn't fixed in linux-next, either.
> >> Paul Bolle also sent a patch that fixes the same warning in a little
> >> bit different way.
> >
> > Well, it is and it isn't.  Whether you see the warning seems to depend
> > on how gcc was built.  My take is that an impossible default case just
> > to keep some versions of gcc quiet is a bit pointless.
> 
> As Joe said in the other reply, scsi_debug_guard could be a negative
> value (scsi_debug_guard > 1 is only prohibited).  So this warning
> does not seem a false positive.

I too think that GCC is correct here. Perhaps the people not seeing this
warning don't have CONFIG_SCSI_DEBUG set.

A week ago Antonia also submitted a patch to silence this warning
( https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/13/649 ). That's at least the third time
someone tried to silence it since it got introduced in the v3.11 cycle.

Akinobu, could you please say how you'd like this warning to be
silenced? Or is an actual fix queued somewhere?


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/