[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130920.115922.1753824753898372116.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:59:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: joe@...ches.com
Cc: stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mpatocka@...hat.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rob@...dley.net,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stable_kernel_rules.txt: Exclude networking from
stable rules
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 07:54:40 -0700
> On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 11:31 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> Networking is once again "special", so at least document
>> how it's working today in the hope that doing so makes
>> less work for all that actually read the documentation.
>
> David, why did you mark this N/A is patchwork?
> It's your rule, why not document it?
Because it should go through whoever maintains that document, and
that isn't me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists