[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130920162329.GC18721@radagast>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:23:30 -0500
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
CC: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
BenoƮt Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: OMAP3630: Add generic machine descriptor
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:19:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> wrote:
> > An alternative approach may be to (for all SoCs):
> > 1. define every SoC entry - ti,omap3430 ti,omap3630...
> > 2. have a generic omap3_init which uses "if (of_machine_is_compatible("ti,omap3630"))"
> > to invoke the appropriate omap3xxx_init_early.
>
> Yes, this would be better, but you can do add a DT_MACHINE as in this
> patch but have ti,omap3630 as the dt_compat table. Then there's no
> need to add runtime checks.
I was going to reply that adding of_machine_is_compatible("ti,omap3630")
would help in some situations, but guess it's already tainted ;-)
cheers
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists