lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130920175150.GA24770@windriver.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Sep 2013 13:51:50 -0400
From:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<gleb@...hat.com>, <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
	<linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: Make kvm_lock non-raw

[Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: Make kvm_lock non-raw] On 16/09/2013 (Mon 18:12) Paul Gortmaker wrote:

> On 13-09-16 10:06 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Paul Gortmaker reported a BUG on preempt-rt kernels, due to taking the
> > mmu_lock within the raw kvm_lock in mmu_shrink_scan.  He provided a
> > patch that shrunk the kvm_lock critical section so that the mmu_lock
> > critical section does not nest with it, but in the end there is no reason
> > for the vm_list to be protected by a raw spinlock.  Only manipulations
> > of kvm_usage_count and the consequent hardware_enable/disable operations
> > are not preemptable.
> > 
> > This small series thus splits the kvm_lock in the "raw" part and the
> > "non-raw" part.
> > 
> > Paul, could you please provide your Tested-by?
> 
> Sure, I'll go back and see if I can find what triggered it in the
> original report, and give the patches a spin on 3.4.x-rt (and probably
> 3.10.x-rt, since that is where rt-current is presently).

Seems fine on 3.4-rt.  On 3.10.10-rt7 it looks like there are other
issues, probably not explicitly related to this patchset (see below).

Paul.
--

e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth1: removed PHC
assign device 0:0:19.0
pci 0000:00:19.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X
pci 0000:00:19.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X
pci 0000:00:19.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X
pci 0000:00:19.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at /home/paul/git/linux-rt/kernel/rtmutex.c:659
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 0, name: swapper/0
2 locks held by swapper/0/0:
 #0:  (rcu_read_lock){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8100998a>] kvm_set_irq_inatomic+0x2a/0x4a0
 #1:  (rcu_read_lock){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81038800>] kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic_fast+0x60/0x3d0
irq event stamp: 6121390
hardirqs last  enabled at (6121389): [<ffffffff819f9ae0>] restore_args+0x0/0x30
hardirqs last disabled at (6121390): [<ffffffff819f9a2a>] common_interrupt+0x6a/0x6f
softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<          (null)>]           (null)
softirqs last disabled at (0): [<          (null)>]           (null)
Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff810ebb9a>] cpu_startup_entry+0x1ba/0x430

CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.10.10-rt7 #2
Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 990/0VNP2H, BIOS A17 03/14/2013
 ffffffff8201c440 ffff880223603cf0 ffffffff819f177d ffff880223603d18
 ffffffff810c90d3 ffff880214a50110 0000000000000001 0000000000000001
 ffff880223603d38 ffffffff819f89a4 ffff880214a50110 ffff880214a50110
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>  [<ffffffff819f177d>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
 [<ffffffff810c90d3>] __might_sleep+0x153/0x250
 [<ffffffff819f89a4>] rt_spin_lock+0x24/0x60
 [<ffffffff810ccdd6>] __wake_up+0x36/0x70
 [<ffffffff81003bbb>] kvm_vcpu_kick+0x3b/0xd0
 [<ffffffff810371a2>] __apic_accept_irq+0x2b2/0x3a0
 [<ffffffff810385f7>] kvm_apic_set_irq+0x27/0x30
 [<ffffffff8103894e>] kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic_fast+0x1ae/0x3d0
 [<ffffffff81038800>] ? kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic_fast+0x60/0x3d0
 [<ffffffff81009a8b>] kvm_set_irq_inatomic+0x12b/0x4a0
 [<ffffffff8100998a>] ? kvm_set_irq_inatomic+0x2a/0x4a0
 [<ffffffff8100c5b3>] kvm_assigned_dev_msi+0x23/0x40
 [<ffffffff8113cb38>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x88/0x3d0
 [<ffffffff810ebb7c>] ? cpu_startup_entry+0x19c/0x430
 [<ffffffff8113cec8>] handle_irq_event+0x48/0x70
 [<ffffffff8113f9b7>] handle_edge_irq+0x77/0x120
 [<ffffffff8104c6ae>] handle_irq+0x1e/0x30
 [<ffffffff81a035ca>] do_IRQ+0x5a/0xd0
 [<ffffffff819f9a2f>] common_interrupt+0x6f/0x6f
 <EOI>  [<ffffffff819f9ae0>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
 [<ffffffff810ebb7c>] ? cpu_startup_entry+0x19c/0x430
 [<ffffffff810ebb38>] ? cpu_startup_entry+0x158/0x430
 [<ffffffff819db767>] rest_init+0x137/0x140
 [<ffffffff819db635>] ? rest_init+0x5/0x140
 [<ffffffff822fde18>] start_kernel+0x3af/0x3bc
 [<ffffffff822fd870>] ? repair_env_string+0x5e/0x5e
 [<ffffffff822fd5a5>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
 [<ffffffff822fd673>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xcc/0xcf

=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
3.10.10-rt7 #2 Not tainted
---------------------------------
inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W} usage.
swapper/0/0 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
 (&(&(&q->lock)->lock)->wait_lock){?.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff819f7e98>] rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x48/0x370
{HARDIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
  [<ffffffff810fc94d>] __lock_acquire+0x69d/0x20e0
  [<ffffffff810feaee>] lock_acquire+0x9e/0x1f0
  [<ffffffff819f9090>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80
  [<ffffffff819f7e98>] rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x48/0x370
  [<ffffffff819f89ac>] rt_spin_lock+0x2c/0x60
  [<ffffffff810ccdd6>] __wake_up+0x36/0x70
  [<ffffffff8109c5ce>] run_timer_softirq+0x1be/0x390
  [<ffffffff81092a09>] do_current_softirqs+0x239/0x5b0
  [<ffffffff81092db8>] run_ksoftirqd+0x38/0x60
  [<ffffffff810c5d7c>] smpboot_thread_fn+0x22c/0x340
  [<ffffffff810bbf4d>] kthread+0xcd/0xe0
  [<ffffffff81a019dc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
irq event stamp: 6121390
hardirqs last  enabled at (6121389): [<ffffffff819f9ae0>] restore_args+0x0/0x30
hardirqs last disabled at (6121390): [<ffffffff819f9a2a>] common_interrupt+0x6a/0x6f
softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<          (null)>]           (null)
softirqs last disabled at (0): [<          (null)>]           (null)

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&(&(&q->lock)->lock)->wait_lock);
  <Interrupt>
    lock(&(&(&q->lock)->lock)->wait_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by swapper/0/0:
 #0:  (rcu_read_lock){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8100998a>] kvm_set_irq_inatomic+0x2a/0x4a0
 #1:  (rcu_read_lock){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81038800>] kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic_fast+0x60/0x3d0

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.10.10-rt7 #2
Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 990/0VNP2H, BIOS A17 03/14/2013
 ffffffff8262b550 ffff880223603a40 ffffffff819f177d ffff880223603a90
 ffffffff819ec532 0000000000000000 ffffffff00000000 ffff880200000001
 0000000000000002 ffffffff8201ccc0 ffffffff810f9040 0000000000000000
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>  [<ffffffff819f177d>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
 [<ffffffff819ec532>] print_usage_bug.part.36+0x28b/0x29a
 [<ffffffff810f9040>] ? check_usage_backwards+0x150/0x150
 [<ffffffff810f9dab>] mark_lock+0x28b/0x6a0
 [<ffffffff810fcbf9>] __lock_acquire+0x949/0x20e0
 [<ffffffff811091f2>] ? __module_text_address+0x12/0x60
 [<ffffffff8110ea8f>] ? is_module_text_address+0x2f/0x60
 [<ffffffff810b8408>] ? __kernel_text_address+0x58/0x80
 [<ffffffff8104dbb2>] ? print_context_stack+0x62/0xf0
 [<ffffffff810feaee>] lock_acquire+0x9e/0x1f0
 [<ffffffff819f7e98>] ? rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x48/0x370
 [<ffffffff819f9090>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80
 [<ffffffff819f7e98>] ? rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x48/0x370
 [<ffffffff819f7e98>] rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x48/0x370
 [<ffffffff819f89ac>] rt_spin_lock+0x2c/0x60
 [<ffffffff810ccdd6>] __wake_up+0x36/0x70
 [<ffffffff81003bbb>] kvm_vcpu_kick+0x3b/0xd0
 [<ffffffff810371a2>] __apic_accept_irq+0x2b2/0x3a0
 [<ffffffff810385f7>] kvm_apic_set_irq+0x27/0x30
 [<ffffffff8103894e>] kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic_fast+0x1ae/0x3d0
 [<ffffffff81038800>] ? kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic_fast+0x60/0x3d0
 [<ffffffff81009a8b>] kvm_set_irq_inatomic+0x12b/0x4a0
 [<ffffffff8100998a>] ? kvm_set_irq_inatomic+0x2a/0x4a0
 [<ffffffff8100c5b3>] kvm_assigned_dev_msi+0x23/0x40
 [<ffffffff8113cb38>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x88/0x3d0
 [<ffffffff810ebb7c>] ? cpu_startup_entry+0x19c/0x430
 [<ffffffff8113cec8>] handle_irq_event+0x48/0x70
 [<ffffffff8113f9b7>] handle_edge_irq+0x77/0x120
 [<ffffffff8104c6ae>] handle_irq+0x1e/0x30
 [<ffffffff81a035ca>] do_IRQ+0x5a/0xd0
 [<ffffffff819f9a2f>] common_interrupt+0x6f/0x6f
 <EOI>  [<ffffffff819f9ae0>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
 [<ffffffff810ebb7c>] ? cpu_startup_entry+0x19c/0x430
 [<ffffffff810ebb38>] ? cpu_startup_entry+0x158/0x430
 [<ffffffff819db767>] rest_init+0x137/0x140
 [<ffffffff819db635>] ? rest_init+0x5/0x140
 [<ffffffff822fde18>] start_kernel+0x3af/0x3bc
 [<ffffffff822fd870>] ? repair_env_string+0x5e/0x5e
 [<ffffffff822fd5a5>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
 [<ffffffff822fd673>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xcc/0xcf

> 
> Paul.
> --
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Paolo
> > 
> > Paolo Bonzini (3):
> >   KVM: cleanup (physical) CPU hotplug
> >   KVM: protect kvm_usage_count with its own spinlock
> >   KVM: Convert kvm_lock back to non-raw spinlock
> > 
> >  Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt |  8 ++++--
> >  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c                    |  4 +--
> >  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                    |  8 +++---
> >  include/linux/kvm_host.h              |  2 +-
> >  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c                   | 51 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >  5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> > 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ