linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM / OPP: rename functions to dev_pm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <523C9CE5.9040009@ti.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Sep 2013 14:07:17 -0500
From:	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM / OPP: rename functions to dev_pm_opp*

On 09/20/2013 11:51 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20 September 2013 18:08, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> wrote:
> 
>> I am open to suggestions if any one feels we can improve this better.
> 
> I didn't really had one.. I thought of pm_opp** instead of dev_pm_opp**
> though..

I had proposed this earlier, however, had gone with Rafael's
suggestion [1] to have the right context to the usage.

> 
>> I believe that change was from Patch #2[1]
> 
> Yeah.. I just replied on a single patch :)
> 
>> yes, you are right, I had squashed this patch in to squelch checkpatch
>> warnings:
> 
> I see..
> 
>> I had added a comment:
>> " Minor checkpatch warning fixes as a result of this change was fixed as
>> well."
> 
> I really missed that..
no problems..

> 
>> Would you suggest I split the change off to a separate patch or improve
>>  the comment a little more?
> 
> don't really know, maybe leave those as is and let checkpatch warn you..
> 
that is fair as well. i can split it off seperately in the next respin.

[1] http://marc.info/?l=linaro-kernel&m=137645747511725&w=2
-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/