[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb01+MCUY1zaoTJ_o5yqaZFNJMH91kc4F6mMu+Oyg--Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 22:41:15 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/41] usb: musb: ux500: Don't supply a con_id when
requesting the clock
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> If we supply a con_id then the clock framework will search for that name
> in MUSB's Device Tree node for the 'clock-names' property. If it's absent
> the clock request will fail. However, if we don't supply the con_id then
> clk_get() will call into clk_sys() which will use the device name to
> search for the appropriate clock, which is much more natural than forcing
> 'usb'.
>
> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Looks fine to me, Felipe can we have your ACK on this so I can take
this with the rest of the clock stuff through ARM SoC?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists