[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130920082458.GA10507@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 10:24:59 +0200
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] PCI/MSI: Factor out pci_get_msi_cap() interface
Michael et al.
The identifiable options sounded so far were:
* Do not change anything
* Make pci_enable_msix() return 0/-errno
* Make pci_enable_msix() return 0/-errno and introduce arch_get_msix_limit()/
arch_get_msi_limit()
* Make pci_enable_msix() return 0/-errno and introduce pci_get_msix_limit()/
pci_get_msi_limit() and arch_get_msix_limit()/arch_get_msi_limit() so that:
pci_get_msix_limit() = min(arch_get_msix_limit(), pci_msix_table_size())
pci_get_msi_limit() = min(arch_get_msi_limit(), pci_get_msi_cap())
Can we have a conclusion here?
Thanks!
--
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists