[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZrjM0cQm8AXNDnaSh2Tp5BVcevDUObFg87cUTEmJxc1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 10:36:34 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] gpiolib: factorize gpiod_get/set functions
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com> wrote:
> gpiod_get/set functions share common code between their regular and
> cansleep variants. The exporting of the gpiod interface will make
> the situation worse. This patch factorizes the common code to avoid code
> redundancy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
I don't see why this patch should be RFC?
I just rebased and applied it, it's a clean and nice refactoring.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists