[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <523D40A3.4050906@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 12:15:55 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Linux PPC dev <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
ellerman@....ibm.com,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
michael.neuling@....ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] perf: New conditional branch filter
On 09/21/2013 12:11 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 08/30/2013 05:18 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> 2013/8/30 Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>> This patchset is the re-spin of the original branch stack sampling
>>>> patchset which introduced new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND filter. This patchset
>>>> also enables SW based branch filtering support for PPC64 platforms which have
>>>> branch stack sampling support. With this new enablement, the branch filter support
>>>> for PPC64 platforms have been extended to include all these combinations discussed
>>>> below with a sample test application program.
>>>>
>>>>
>> I am trying to understand which HW has support for capturing the
>> branches: PPC7 or PPC8.
>> Then it seems you're saying that only PPC8 has the filtering support.
>> On PPC7 you use the
>> SW filter. Did I get this right?
>>
>> I will look at the patch set.
>>
>
> Hey Stephane,
>
> Just wondering if you got a chance to go though the patchset ?
s/though/through/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists