[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAVeFu+mxhfK1rqO3jcx2FSJ4bCGjHDQ7ouSP1qK99RrMaHXjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:39:14 +0900
From: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] gpiolib: factorize gpiod_get/set functions
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com> wrote:
>
>> gpiod_get/set functions share common code between their regular and
>> cansleep variants. The exporting of the gpiod interface will make
>> the situation worse. This patch factorizes the common code to avoid code
>> redundancy.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
>
> I don't see why this patch should be RFC?
>
> I just rebased and applied it, it's a clean and nice refactoring.
Oh yeah, I just sent it with the others, but please feel free to apply
it as-is. It should be fine.
Alex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists