[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130921155914.GH2737@rocoto.smurfnet.nu>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 17:59:15 +0200
From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
Roy Franz <roy.franz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] efi: Remove EFI_PAGE_SHIFT and EFI_PAGE_SIZE
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 05:41:43PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 05:21:39PM +0200, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>
> > It will probably not be a problem on the stub side, and it's not used
> > in many places but it would break efi_lookup_mapped_address(),
> > efi_range_is_wc() and memrange_efi_to_native() for use by arm64.
> > At least the first of these would be a problem.
>
> Ok, maybe the generic header include/linux/efi.h might be a problem but
> the rest are changes to arch/x86/ which should have no effect whatsoever
> on any other arch.
Indeed - my concerns are restricted to include/linux/efi.h and
drivers/firmware/efi.c.
> Or are you planning to move some of it into generic code?
I think some of the stub code is moved to generic in Roy's/Mark's
patches - but then the stub shouldn't be an issue as in UEFI we have
4K pages.
/
Leif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists