linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/5] Bluetooth: Fix assignment of 0/1 to bool variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1379875453-20083-2-git-send-email-peter.senna@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 22 Sep 2013 20:44:10 +0200
From:	Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>
To:	marcel@...tmann.org
Cc:	gustavo@...ovan.org, johan.hedberg@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] Bluetooth: Fix assignment of 0/1 to bool variables

Convert 0 to false and 1 to true when assigning values to bool
variables. Inspired by commit 3db1cd5c05f35fb43eb134df6f321de4e63141f2.

The simplified semantic patch that find this problem is as
follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/):

@@
bool b;
@@
(
-b = 0
+b = false
|
-b = 1
+b = true
)

Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>

---
 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c |   16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff -u -p a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
--- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
@@ -5797,7 +5797,7 @@ static int l2cap_rx_state_recv(struct l2
 			       struct sk_buff *skb, u8 event)
 {
 	int err = 0;
-	bool skb_in_use = 0;
+	bool skb_in_use = false;
 
 	BT_DBG("chan %p, control %p, skb %p, event %d", chan, control, skb,
 	       event);
@@ -5818,7 +5818,7 @@ static int l2cap_rx_state_recv(struct l2
 							   control->txseq);
 
 			chan->buffer_seq = chan->expected_tx_seq;
-			skb_in_use = 1;
+			skb_in_use = true;
 
 			err = l2cap_reassemble_sdu(chan, skb, control);
 			if (err)
@@ -5854,7 +5854,7 @@ static int l2cap_rx_state_recv(struct l2
 			 * current frame is stored for later use.
 			 */
 			skb_queue_tail(&chan->srej_q, skb);
-			skb_in_use = 1;
+			skb_in_use = true;
 			BT_DBG("Queued %p (queue len %d)", skb,
 			       skb_queue_len(&chan->srej_q));
 
@@ -5932,7 +5932,7 @@ static int l2cap_rx_state_srej_sent(stru
 {
 	int err = 0;
 	u16 txseq = control->txseq;
-	bool skb_in_use = 0;
+	bool skb_in_use = false;
 
 	BT_DBG("chan %p, control %p, skb %p, event %d", chan, control, skb,
 	       event);
@@ -5944,7 +5944,7 @@ static int l2cap_rx_state_srej_sent(stru
 			/* Keep frame for reassembly later */
 			l2cap_pass_to_tx(chan, control);
 			skb_queue_tail(&chan->srej_q, skb);
-			skb_in_use = 1;
+			skb_in_use = true;
 			BT_DBG("Queued %p (queue len %d)", skb,
 			       skb_queue_len(&chan->srej_q));
 
@@ -5955,7 +5955,7 @@ static int l2cap_rx_state_srej_sent(stru
 
 			l2cap_pass_to_tx(chan, control);
 			skb_queue_tail(&chan->srej_q, skb);
-			skb_in_use = 1;
+			skb_in_use = true;
 			BT_DBG("Queued %p (queue len %d)", skb,
 			       skb_queue_len(&chan->srej_q));
 
@@ -5970,7 +5970,7 @@ static int l2cap_rx_state_srej_sent(stru
 			 * the missing frames.
 			 */
 			skb_queue_tail(&chan->srej_q, skb);
-			skb_in_use = 1;
+			skb_in_use = true;
 			BT_DBG("Queued %p (queue len %d)", skb,
 			       skb_queue_len(&chan->srej_q));
 
@@ -5984,7 +5984,7 @@ static int l2cap_rx_state_srej_sent(stru
 			 * SREJ'd frames.
 			 */
 			skb_queue_tail(&chan->srej_q, skb);
-			skb_in_use = 1;
+			skb_in_use = true;
 			BT_DBG("Queued %p (queue len %d)", skb,
 			       skb_queue_len(&chan->srej_q));
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/