[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130922204137.GA1612@dcvr.yhbt.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 20:41:37 +0000
From: Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Cc: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC] eventpoll: Move a kmem_cache_alloc and kmem_cache_free
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com> wrote:
> epoll: reduce usage of global 'epmutex' lock
>
> Epoll file descriptors that are 1 link from a wakeup source and
> are not nested within other epoll descriptors, or pointing to
> other epoll descriptors, don't need to check for loop creation or
> the creation of wakeup storms. Because of this we can avoid taking
> the global 'epmutex' in these cases. This state for the epoll file
> descriptor is marked as 'EVENTPOLL_BASIC'. Once the epoll file
> descriptor is attached to another epoll file descriptor it is
> labeled as 'EVENTPOLL_COMPLEX', and full loop checking and wakeup
> storm creation are checked using the the global 'epmutex'. It does
> not transition back. Hopefully, this is a common usecase...
Cool. I was thinking about doing the same thing down the line (for
EPOLL_CTL_ADD, too)
> @@ -166,6 +167,14 @@ struct epitem {
>
> /* The structure that describe the interested events and the source fd */
> struct epoll_event event;
> +
> + /* TODO: really necessary? */
> + int on_list;
There's some things we can overload to avoid increasing epitem size
(.ep, .ffd.fd, ...), so on_list should be unnecessary.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists