[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1379844021.5598.8.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:00:21 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
To: Jia He <jiakernel@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc/sem.c: fix update sem_otime when calling sem_op in
semaphore initialization
On Sun, 2013-09-22 at 17:34 +0800, Jia He wrote:
> Thanks for the comments, but pls add my email as "from jiakernel@...il.com"
> if you have a better implementation.U know, it is my first kernel patch, maybe
> will give me a brilliant memory in the future :)
You can have the blame if you like :)
> Anyway, your implementation looks not correct to me. Because from "man semop"
> sem_otime will record the last sem operation time of semop. If you change the
> otime in semget(), it changes the meanings in stardard, doesn't it?
A Linux kernel doing a semop in 1970 would be a kinda neat trick :)
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists