[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1379937950-8411-3-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:05:30 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>,
Ning Qu <quning@...gle.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCHv6 02/22] radix-tree: implement preload for multiple contiguous elements
The radix tree is variable-height, so an insert operation not only has
to build the branch to its corresponding item, it also has to build the
branch to existing items if the size has to be increased (by
radix_tree_extend).
The worst case is a zero height tree with just a single item at index 0,
and then inserting an item at index ULONG_MAX. This requires 2 new branches
of RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH size to be created, with only the root node shared.
Radix tree is usually protected by spin lock. It means we want to
pre-allocate required memory before taking the lock.
Currently radix_tree_preload() only guarantees enough nodes to insert
one element. It's a hard limit. For transparent huge page cache we want
to insert HPAGE_PMD_NR (512 on x86-64) entries to address_space at once.
This patch introduces radix_tree_preload_count(). It allows to
preallocate nodes enough to insert a number of *contiguous* elements.
The feature costs about 9.5KiB per-CPU on x86_64, details below.
Preload uses per-CPU array to store nodes. The total cost of preload is
"array size" * sizeof(void*) * NR_CPUS. We want to increase array size
to be able to handle 512 entries at once.
Size of array depends on system bitness and on RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT.
We have three possible RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT:
#ifdef __KERNEL__
#define RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT (CONFIG_BASE_SMALL ? 4 : 6)
#else
#define RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT 3 /* For more stressful testing */
#endif
We are not going to use transparent huge page cache on small machines or
in userspace, so we are interested in RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT=6.
On 64-bit system old array size is 21, new is 37. Per-CPU feature
overhead is
for preload array:
(38 - 21) * sizeof(void*) = 136 bytes
plus, if the preload array is full
(38 - 21) * sizeof(struct radix_tree_node) = 17 * 560 = 9520 bytes
total: 9656 bytes
On 32-bit system old array size is 11, new is 22. Per-CPU feature
overhead is
for preload array:
(23 - 11) * sizeof(void*) = 48 bytes
plus, if the preload array is full
(23 - 11) * sizeof(struct radix_tree_node) = 12 * 296 = 3552 bytes
total: 3600 bytes
Since only THP uses batched preload at the moment, we disable (set max
preload to 1) it if !CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PAGECACHE. This can be
changed in the future.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
include/linux/radix-tree.h | 11 ++++++
lib/radix-tree.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/radix-tree.h b/include/linux/radix-tree.h
index 403940787b..3bf0b3e594 100644
--- a/include/linux/radix-tree.h
+++ b/include/linux/radix-tree.h
@@ -83,6 +83,16 @@ do { \
(root)->rnode = NULL; \
} while (0)
+#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PAGECACHE
+/*
+ * At the moment only THP uses preload for more then on item for batched
+ * pagecache manipulations.
+ */
+#define RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_NR 512
+#else
+#define RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_NR 1
+#endif
+
/**
* Radix-tree synchronization
*
@@ -232,6 +242,7 @@ unsigned long radix_tree_prev_hole(struct radix_tree_root *root,
unsigned long index, unsigned long max_scan);
int radix_tree_preload(gfp_t gfp_mask);
int radix_tree_maybe_preload(gfp_t gfp_mask);
+int radix_tree_maybe_preload_contig(unsigned size, gfp_t gfp_mask);
void radix_tree_init(void);
void *radix_tree_tag_set(struct radix_tree_root *root,
unsigned long index, unsigned int tag);
diff --git a/lib/radix-tree.c b/lib/radix-tree.c
index 7811ed3b4e..544a00a93b 100644
--- a/lib/radix-tree.c
+++ b/lib/radix-tree.c
@@ -84,14 +84,51 @@ static struct kmem_cache *radix_tree_node_cachep;
* of RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH size to be created, with only the root node shared.
* Hence:
*/
-#define RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_SIZE (RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH * 2 - 1)
+#define RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_MIN (RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH * 2 - 1)
+
+/*
+ * Inserting N contiguous items is more complex. To simplify calculation, let's
+ * limit N (validated in radix_tree_init()):
+ * - N is multiplier of RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE (or 1);
+ * - N <= number of items 2-level tree can contain:
+ * 1UL << (2 * RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT).
+ *
+ * No limitation on insert index alignment.
+ *
+ * Then the worst case is tree with only one element at index 0 and we add N
+ * items which cross boundary between items in root node.
+ *
+ * Basically, at least one index is less then
+ *
+ * 1UL << ((RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH - 1) * RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT + 1)
+ *
+ * and one is equal to.
+ *
+ * In this case we need:
+ *
+ * - RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH nodes to build new path to item with index 0;
+ * - N / RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE + 1 nodes for last level nodes for new items:
+ * - +1 is for misalinged case;
+ * - 2 * (RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH - 2) - 1 nodes to build path to last level nodes:
+ * - -2, because root node and last level nodes are already accounted).
+ *
+ * Hence:
+ */
+#if RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_NR > 1
+#define RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_MAX \
+ ( RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH + \
+ RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_NR / RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE + 1 + \
+ 2 * (RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH - 2))
+#else
+#define RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_MAX RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_MIN
+#endif
/*
* Per-cpu pool of preloaded nodes
*/
struct radix_tree_preload {
int nr;
- struct radix_tree_node *nodes[RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_SIZE];
+ struct radix_tree_node *nodes[RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_MAX];
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct radix_tree_preload, radix_tree_preloads) = { 0, };
@@ -263,29 +300,43 @@ radix_tree_node_free(struct radix_tree_node *node)
/*
* Load up this CPU's radix_tree_node buffer with sufficient objects to
- * ensure that the addition of a single element in the tree cannot fail. On
- * success, return zero, with preemption disabled. On error, return -ENOMEM
+ * ensure that the addition of *contiguous* items in the tree cannot fail.
+ * On success, return zero, with preemption disabled. On error, return -ENOMEM
* with preemption not disabled.
*
* To make use of this facility, the radix tree must be initialised without
* __GFP_WAIT being passed to INIT_RADIX_TREE().
*/
-static int __radix_tree_preload(gfp_t gfp_mask)
+static int __radix_tree_preload_contig(unsigned size, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
struct radix_tree_preload *rtp;
struct radix_tree_node *node;
int ret = -ENOMEM;
+ int preload_target = RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_MIN;
+ if (size > 1) {
+ size = round_up(size, RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE);
+ if (WARN_ONCE(size > RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_NR,
+ "too large preload requested"))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ /* The same math as with RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_MAX */
+ preload_target = RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH +
+ size / RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE + 1 +
+ 2 * (RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH - 2);
+ }
+
+ BUG_ON(preload_target > RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_MAX);
preempt_disable();
rtp = &__get_cpu_var(radix_tree_preloads);
- while (rtp->nr < ARRAY_SIZE(rtp->nodes)) {
+ while (rtp->nr < preload_target) {
preempt_enable();
node = kmem_cache_alloc(radix_tree_node_cachep, gfp_mask);
if (node == NULL)
goto out;
preempt_disable();
rtp = &__get_cpu_var(radix_tree_preloads);
- if (rtp->nr < ARRAY_SIZE(rtp->nodes))
+ if (rtp->nr < preload_target)
rtp->nodes[rtp->nr++] = node;
else
kmem_cache_free(radix_tree_node_cachep, node);
@@ -308,7 +359,7 @@ int radix_tree_preload(gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
/* Warn on non-sensical use... */
WARN_ON_ONCE(!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT));
- return __radix_tree_preload(gfp_mask);
+ return __radix_tree_preload_contig(1, gfp_mask);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(radix_tree_preload);
@@ -320,13 +371,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(radix_tree_preload);
int radix_tree_maybe_preload(gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
if (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT)
- return __radix_tree_preload(gfp_mask);
+ return __radix_tree_preload_contig(1, gfp_mask);
/* Preloading doesn't help anything with this gfp mask, skip it */
preempt_disable();
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(radix_tree_maybe_preload);
+int radix_tree_maybe_preload_contig(unsigned size, gfp_t gfp_mask)
+{
+ if (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT)
+ return __radix_tree_preload_contig(size, gfp_mask);
+ /* Preloading doesn't help anything with this gfp mask, skip it */
+ preempt_disable();
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Return the maximum key which can be store into a
* radix tree with height HEIGHT.
@@ -1483,6 +1543,22 @@ static int radix_tree_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
void __init radix_tree_init(void)
{
+ /*
+ * Restrictions on RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_NR simplify RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_MAX
+ * calculation, it's already complex enough:
+ * - it must be multiplier of RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE, otherwise we will
+ * have to round it up to next RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE multiplier and we
+ * don't win anything;
+ * - must be less then number of items 2-level tree can contain.
+ * It's easier to calculate number of internal nodes required
+ * this way.
+ */
+ if (RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_NR != 1) {
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_NR % RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE != 0);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(RADIX_TREE_PRELOAD_NR >
+ 1UL << (2 * RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT));
+ }
+
radix_tree_node_cachep = kmem_cache_create("radix_tree_node",
sizeof(struct radix_tree_node), 0,
SLAB_PANIC | SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT,
--
1.8.4.rc3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists