| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <52404DBD.6010607@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:18:37 -0400
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: xen-devel@...ts.xen.org, david.vrabel@...rix.com,
JBeulich@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] xen/PMU: Initialization code for Xen PMU
On 09/23/2013 09:26 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:31:48AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> Map shared data structure that will hold CPU registers, VPMU context,
>> VCPU/PCPI IDs of the VCPU interrupted by PMU interrupt. Hypervisor
>> fills this information in its handler and passes it to the guest for
>> further processing.
>>
>> Set up PMU VIRQ.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/xen/Makefile | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/xen/pmu.c | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/x86/xen/pmu.h | 12 ++++
>> arch/x86/xen/smp.c | 31 ++++++++++-
>> include/xen/interface/xen.h | 1 +
>> include/xen/interface/xenpmu.h | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 6 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/x86/xen/pmu.c
>> create mode 100644 arch/x86/xen/pmu.h
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/Makefile b/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
>> index 96ab2c0..b187df5 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
>> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ CFLAGS_mmu.o := $(nostackp)
>> obj-y := enlighten.o setup.o multicalls.o mmu.o irq.o \
>> time.o xen-asm.o xen-asm_$(BITS).o \
>> grant-table.o suspend.o platform-pci-unplug.o \
>> - p2m.o
>> + p2m.o pmu.o
> Perhaps guard the build of this based on CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS?
>
> That would of course mean you also have to create in xenpmu.h
> static inline empy functions for xen_pmu_finish and xen_pmu_init in case
> CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS is not set.
This is interface header, am I allowed to do those sorts of things there?
Also, *theoretically* other performance-measuring tools can use this
framework, expect for perf-specific things like callbacks and the
handler call. So maybe I should put CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS in pmu.c?
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING) += trace.o
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/pmu.c b/arch/x86/xen/pmu.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..da061d4
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/pmu.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +
>> +#include <asm/xen/hypercall.h>
>> +#include <xen/page.h>
>> +#include <xen/interface/xen.h>
>> +#include <xen/interface/vcpu.h>
>> +#include <xen/interface/xenpmu.h>
>> +
>> +#include "xen-ops.h"
>> +#include "pmu.h"
>> +
>> +/* x86_pmu.handle_irq definition */
>> +#include <../kernel/cpu/perf_event.h>
>> +
>> +
>> +/* Shared page between hypervisor and domain */
>> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct xenpmu_data *, xenpmu_shared);
>> +
>> +/* perf callbacks*/
>> +int xen_is_in_guest(void)
>> +{
>> + struct xenpmu_data *xenpmu_data = per_cpu(xenpmu_shared,
>> + smp_processor_id());
>> +
>> + if (!xen_initial_domain() ||
>> + xenpmu_data->domain_id > DOMID_SELF || xenpmu_data->domain_id == 0)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + return 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int xen_is_user_mode(void)
>> +{
>> + struct xenpmu_data *xenpmu_data = per_cpu(xenpmu_shared,
>> + smp_processor_id());
>> + return ((xenpmu_data->regs.cs & 3) == 3);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static unsigned long xen_get_guest_ip(void)
>> +{
>> + struct xenpmu_data *xenpmu_data = per_cpu(xenpmu_shared,
>> + smp_processor_id());
>> + return xenpmu_data->regs.eip;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct perf_guest_info_callbacks xen_guest_cbs = {
>> + .is_in_guest = xen_is_in_guest,
>> + .is_user_mode = xen_is_user_mode,
>> + .get_guest_ip = xen_get_guest_ip,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Convert registers from Xen's format to Linux' */
>> +static void xen_convert_regs(struct cpu_user_regs *xen_regs,
>> + struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> + regs->ip = xen_regs->eip;
>> + regs->cs = xen_regs->cs;
>> +}
>> +
>> +irqreturn_t xen_pmu_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> + int ret = IRQ_NONE;
>> + struct pt_regs regs;
>> + struct xenpmu_data *xenpmu_data = per_cpu(xenpmu_shared,
>> + smp_processor_id());
>> +
>> + xen_convert_regs(&xenpmu_data->regs, ®s);
>> + if (x86_pmu.handle_irq(®s))
>> + ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int xen_pmu_init(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + struct xenpmu_params xp;
>> + unsigned long pfn;
>> + struct xenpmu_data *xenpmu_data;
>> +
>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct xenpmu_data) > PAGE_SIZE);
>> + xenpmu_data = vmalloc(PAGE_SIZE);
>> + if (!xenpmu_data) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto fail;
>> + }
>> + pfn = vmalloc_to_pfn((char *)xenpmu_data);
>> +
>> + xp.mfn = pfn_to_mfn(pfn);
>> + xp.vcpu = cpu;
>> + xp.version.maj = XENPMU_VER_MAJ;
>> + xp.version.min = XENPMU_VER_MIN;
>> + ret = HYPERVISOR_xenpmu_op(XENPMU_init, &xp);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto fail;
>> +
>> + per_cpu(xenpmu_shared, cpu) = xenpmu_data;
>> +
>> + if (cpu == 0)
>> + perf_register_guest_info_callbacks(&xen_guest_cbs);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> +fail:
>> + vfree(xenpmu_data);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void xen_pmu_finish(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + struct xenpmu_params xp;
>> +
>> + xp.vcpu = cpu;
>> + xp.version.maj = XENPMU_VER_MAJ;
>> + xp.version.min = XENPMU_VER_MIN;
>> +
>> + (void)HYPERVISOR_xenpmu_op(XENPMU_finish, &xp);
>> +
>> + vfree(per_cpu(xenpmu_shared, cpu));
>> + per_cpu(xenpmu_shared, cpu) = NULL;
> I think you are missing:
>
> perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks when this is the bootup CPU.
But there is always at least one CPU running, so I think I should keep
the callbacks. The only reason I have 'if (cpu == 0)' when I register
the callbacks is because I only want to do this once and when we are
coming up cpu 0 is always the boot cpu (right?).
>
> And you should probably move this around to be:
>
> if (cpu == 0 && num_online_cpus() == 1)
> perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks(..)
> per_cpu(xenpmu_shared, cpu) = NULL;
> vfree(per_cpu(xenpmu_shared, cpu))
Then I'd be calling vfree(NULL), wouldn't I?
-boris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists